Does GEOBIA enhance vegetation classificationperformance in heterogeneous and dynamic landscapes?

Autores/as

  • Daniel Pfitzer-López Instituto Mixto de Investigación en Biodiversidad (IMIB; Universidad de Oviedo – CSIC – Principado de Asturias) y Departamento de Biología de Organismos y Sistemas (Universidad de Oviedo), Mieres, Oviedo España Autor/a https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4167-4398
  • José V. Roces-Díaz Instituto Mixto de Investigación en Biodiversidad (IMIB; Universidad de Oviedo – CSIC – Principado de Asturias) y Departamento de Biología de Organismos y Sistemas (Universidad de Oviedo), Mieres, Oviedo España Autor/a https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2569-8049
  • José M. Fernández-Guisuraga Departamento de Biodiversidad y Gestión Ambiental, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad de León, León, España. Autor/a https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-3981
  • Lucía García-Candanedo Instituto Mixto de Investigación en Biodiversidad (IMIB; Universidad de Oviedo – CSIC – Principado de Asturias) y Departamento de Biología de Organismos y Sistemas (Universidad de Oviedo), Mieres, Oviedo España Autor/a https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5272-9033
  • Susana Suárez-Seoane Instituto Mixto de Investigación en Biodiversidad (IMIB; Universidad de Oviedo – CSIC – Principado de Asturias) y Departamento de Biología de Organismos y Sistemas (Universidad de Oviedo), Mieres, Oviedo España Autor/a https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7656-4214

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17398/3101-7177.2.279

Palabras clave:

Landsat, Continuous Change Detection, Superpixels Segmentation

Resumen

Mapping vegetation types in heterogeneous and dynamic landscapes using long satellite image time series remains challenging due to uncertainties associated with spectral similarity among classes, phenological variability, and sensor differences. This study evaluates different classification approaches using Landsat imagery (1984-2024) processed in Google Earth Engine to map landscape dynamics in Asturias (NW Spain), a region characterized by steep terrain and high environmental heterogeneity. Image preprocessing included cloud masking, topographic correction, and biseasonal compositing to capture phenological differences. Four analysis years were selected (1984, 1998, 2008, and 2023), and 21 predictor variables were compiled, including 12 spectral bands, six texture metrics, and three biophysical traits. To perform the classifications, temporally invariant training polygons were defined using a change detection algorithm, allowing their reuse across all analysis years. Two Random Forest modelling approaches were implemented, pixel-based and object-based, exploring the performance of the three predictor groups both independently and additively. Objects were defined using object-based image analysis techniques (GEOBIA), grouping spectrally and spatially homogeneous pixels. Pixel-based models using spectral bands showed the highest performance (OA ≈ 0.88) and low interannual variability, indicating that invariant polygons enable the use of a single training dataset without loss of performance and with reduced data preparation effort. Although GEOBIA did not improve overall accuracy, it did enhance the classification of fast-growing forest plantations (FSCORE +0.13), likely due to their monospecific composition and well-defined spatial boundaries. We conclude that GEOBIA approaches may be more suitable for clearly
delineated vegetation types, whereas pixel-based classifications may be more appropriate for monitoring heterogeneous landscapes.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Achanta, R., & Susstrunk, S. (2017). Superpixels and Polygons Using Simple Non-iterative Clustering. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 4895–4904. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.520

Arévalo, P., Bullock, E. L., Woodcock, C. E., & Olofsson, P. (2020). A Suite of Tools for Continuous Land Change Monitoring in Google Earth Engine. Frontiers in Climate, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2020.576740

Fernández-Guisuraga, J. M., González-Pérez, I., Reguero-Vaquero, A., & Marcos, E. (2024). Estimating Grassland Biophysical Parameters in the Cantabrian Mountains Using Radiative Transfer Models in Combination with Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Analysis. Remote Sensing, 16(23), 4547. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234547

López Trullén, D., Álvarez-Martínez, J. M., Sánchez Labrador, J. D., Jiménez-Alfaro, B., Pérez-Silos, I., Hernández-Romero, G., & Barquín, J. (2022). Espectrofenología con datos Sentinel 2: definición de curvas de referencia para la caracterización de ecosistemas forestales. Ecosistemas, 2411. https://doi.org/10.7818/ECOS.2411

Martin-Gallego, P., Marston, C. G., Altamirano, A., Pauchard, A., & Aplin, P. (2024). Mapping alien and native forest dynamics in Chile using Earth observation time series analysis. Forest Ecology and Management, 560, 121847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.121847

Pfitzer-López, D., Ramírez-Rodríguez, R., Roces-Díaz, J. V., Álvarez-Martínez, J. M., Quevedo, M., García, D., Jiménez-Alfaro, B., & Suárez-Seoane, S. (2026). A new index for monitoring non-linear trends in passive forest recovery at regional scale. Ecological Indicators, 182, 114532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114532

Verhulst, M., Heremans, S., Blaschko, M. B., & Somers, B. (2024). Temporal Transferability of Tree Species Classification in Temperate Forests with Sentinel-2 Time Series. Remote Sensing, 16(14), 2653. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16142653

Yang, L., Wang, L., Abubakar, G. A., & Huang, J. (2021). High-Resolution Rice Mapping Based on SNIC Segmentation and Multi-Source Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sensing, 13(6), 1148. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13061148

Zhu, Z., & Woodcock, C. E. (2014). Continuous change detection and classification of land cover using all available Landsat data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 144, 152–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.01.011

Descargas

Publicado

2026-06-03

Cómo citar

Does GEOBIA enhance vegetation classificationperformance in heterogeneous and dynamic landscapes?. (2026). Congresos UEx, Actas De Congresos, 2. https://doi.org/10.17398/3101-7177.2.279